One week left for tax reform

SESSION NEAR END — The Louisiana Legislature has to end its session at 6 p.m. June 10, and tax reform, its major goal, is still pending. The session appears to be falling short of simplifying one of the nation's most complicated tax codes

Reform of Louisiana’s complicated tax code was a major goal of the current fiscal session, but it appears the plan has fallen short of what could have been accomplished. Legislative leaders will disagree with that conclusion, so let’s see where we are as the session comes to a close at 6 p.m. Thursday.

Legislation that is still alive with less than a week to go would lower state individual and corporate income tax rates if voters agree to end their ability to deduct federal income taxes paid on state income tax forms.

The goal is to make tax changes revenue neutral, which means the state won’t collect any additional revenue or lose any current revenue. It will be difficult to lower taxes if voters don’t give up those federal deductions that are worth about $850 million annually.

Rep. Stuart Bishop, R-Lafayette, is sponsor of a House bill and a proposed constitutional amendment dealing with the reduction of individual income taxes. Rep. Neil Riser, R-Columbia, has a bill and an amendment that eliminate federal corporate income tax deductions on state income tax forms. Riser also has legislation that establishes a flat corporate income tax.

Speaker of the House Clay Schexnayder, R-Gonzales, is sponsor of a constitutional amendment setting up a centralized system for collecting state and local sales taxes that passed both houses unanimously. Voters will decide the fate of the amendment on Oct. 9.

Schexnayder called passage a “big day for Louisiana.” However, if voters approve the amendment, the details of how the centralized collection system would work still have to be ironed out by a sales tax commission composed of four state and four local officials.

Sen. Bret Allain is sponsor of Senate Bill 159, which is a proposed constitutional amendment changing the maximum allowable individual income tax rate from 5 percent to 4.75 percent.

It comes as no surprise that Republicans, who have dominant control of the Legislature, want to lower income taxes. However, it’s pretty much hands off for them when it comes to the combined state and local sales taxes that are the second highest in the country.

The bills lowering individual income taxes are expected to pass, but they go one step too far. An amendment was added to one of them that says anytime the state collects more income tax revenue than expected, rates have to be lowered again.

Income taxes are growth taxes, and they increase when the economy is good. That makes it possible to fund costof-living increases that are a fact of life for individuals and state and local governments. It’s also a mistake to put a 4.75 individual income tax maximum in the state constitution.

Louisiana has been criticized for having too many tax exemptions, exclusions, credits, deductions, reductions and rebates. The $6.6 billion in annual tax exemptions are potential revenues that could solve a lot of the state’s problems, like its inability to build and maintain its roads, bridges, ports, airports and other infrastructure.

Rather than end many of those tax breaks, some legislators are trying to make a 0.45 percent state sales tax permanent that is supposed to end in 2025.

Once a corporation, business, group or individual gets a tax break, it’s difficult to take it back. Bishop had a bill doing away with some tax exemptions, but because of widespread opposition it never made it to first base.

Rep. Phillip DeVilllier, R-Eunice, had legislation reducing certain tax breaks by 50 percent. It would have raised $190 million in the first year and $850 million by 2025. The bill died in committee.

Legislators not only failed to reduce tax breaks, but they also continued to give more of them during the session.

If the bills reducing income taxes are eventually approved by the Legislature, which is expected, they are facing another hurdle. Voters would get an income tax rate reduction if they vote to give up federal income tax deductions, but they refused to do it on two previous occasions.

The vote was 62 percent against in 2000 and 56 percent against in 2016, If they do it again, tax reform will fail. Sponsors of this year’s legislation have said they will do a better job of explaining the benefits of giving up those deductions.

Unfortunately, successful reform of the state’s complex tax code is still questionable as the legislative session draws to a close.

More from this section

  • Updated

Legislators at the historic veto session of the Louisiana Legislature failed to override any of the 28 bills vetoed by Democratic Gov. John Bel Edwards and ended their session Wednesday.

  • Updated

An historic legislative veto session, as expected, will begin at noon Tuesday and the five-day session has to end Saturday. Only the 12 Democrats of the 39 senators returned ballots to cancel the session and it required at least a majority of 20. Only 35 of 104 members of the House returned …

  • Updated

Louisiana legislators are expected to be meeting in a special session early next year to redraw election district lines, which can often become for lawmakers a self-preservation exercise. It’s not supposed to be political, but the people drawing the lines are politicians and you can’t separa…

  • Updated

Thanks to the 61 percent of Louisianans who haven’t received even their first shot of a COVID-19 vaccine and the arrival of a more contagious delta variant, the state is experiencing a new surge in coronavirus cases.

  • Updated

Former Gov. Edwin W. Edwards is undergoing hospice care at his home in Gonzales, but don’t count him out just yet. Edwards has proved during his 93 years on this earth that he has great staying power.

  • Updated

Some of the 28 bills vetoed by Gov. John Bel Edwards aren’t major surprises because they deal with Louisiana elections that are already among the most accurate in the country. Other vetoes involve legislation that discourages citizens from getting the effective COVID-19 vaccinations in a sta…