Obama admin delays major requirement of health law

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a major concession to

business groups, the Obama administration Tuesday unexpectedly announced

a one-year

delay, until 2105, in a central requirement of the new health care

law that medium and large companies provide coverage for

their workers or face fines.

The move sacrificed timely implementation of

President Barack Obama's signature legislation but may help the


politically by blunting a line of attack Republicans were planning

to use in next year's congressional elections. The employer

requirements are among the most complex parts of the health care

law, which is designed to expand coverage for uninsured Americans.

"We have heard concerns about the complexity of the requirements and the need for more time to implement them effectively,"

Treasury Assistant Secretary Mark Mazur said in a blog post. "We have listened to your feedback and we are taking action."

Business groups were jubilant. "A pleasant surprise," said Randy Johnson, senior vice president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

There was no inkling in advance of the administration's action, he said.

Under the law, companies with 50 or more workers must provide affordable coverage to their full-time employees or risk a series

of escalating tax penalties if just one worker ends up getting government-subsidized insurance.

Originally, that requirement was supposed to

take effect next Jan. 1. Business groups complained since the law

passed that

the provision was too complicated. For instance, the law created a

new definition of full-time workers, those putting in 30

hours or more. But such complaints until now seemed to be going


The delay in the employer requirement does

not affect the law's requirement that individuals carry health insurance


next year or face fines. That so-called individual mandate was

challenged all the way to the Supreme Court, which ruled last

year that requirement was constitutional since the penalty would

be collected by the Internal Revenue Service and amounted

to a tax.

Tuesday's action is sure to anger liberals and labor groups, but it could provide cover for Democratic candidates in next

year's congressional elections.

The move undercuts Republican efforts to

make the overhaul and the costs associated with new requirements a major

issue in

congressional races. Democrats are defending 21 Senate seats to

the Republicans' 14, and the GOP had already started to excoriate

Senate Democrats who had voted for the health law in 2009.

Senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett cast the decision as part of an effort to simplify data reporting requirements.

She said since enforcing the coverage mandate is dependent on businesses reporting about their workers' access to insurance,

the administration decided to postpone the reporting requirement, and with it, the mandate to provide coverage.

"We have and will continue to make changes as needed," Jarrett wrote in a White House blog post. "In our ongoing discussions

with businesses we have heard that you need the time to get this right. We are listening."

Republicans called it a validation of their belief that the law is unworkable and should be repealed.

"Obamacare costs too much and it isn't

working the way the administration promised," said Senate Republican

leader Mitch McConnell

of Kentucky. "The White House seems to slowly be admitting what

Americans already know ... that Obamacare needs to be repealed

and replaced with common-sense reforms that actually lower costs

for Americans."