NCAA discussing governance changes, says it will quit selling jerseys

The NCAA spent Thursday working on a redesigned governance structure.

It will take a lot more time to get it right.

With college football's most powerful

conference commissioners calling for an overhaul, the board of directors

and executive

committees started discussing a major overhaul to how the NCAA

works. Neither board chairman Nathan Hatch nor executive committee

chairwoman Lou Anna Simon offered specifics.

Thursday's meetings officially kicked off the debate that is likely take at least another year. NCAA President Mark Emmert

has already invited campus leaders to a two-day sit-down at January's national convention.

"We worked very closely with the national

office, with Mark's leadership role to learn about the processes," Simon

said. "There

is a commitment for real change. We know it's going to be very

hard work. We are going to play an active role and we are excited

to take on that responsibility."

Simon, the Michigan State president, described the discussion as "animated" and "dynamic."

Hatch, the president at Wake Forest, was far more reserved but did acknowledge he committee hopes to have a formal proposal

ready to be voted on next August.

"There is no doubt this is an ambitious timeline," he said. "But it's about our commitment to best govern Division I college

sports in a way that benefits our athletes in the classroom and on the field."

The repeated calls for change are one more issue Emmert and those inside the Indianapolis-based headquarters have dealt with

in an already turbulent year.

In January, Emmert announced that a rogue

enforcement official improperly obtained evidence during an

investigation into the

University of Miami. A month later, after an external

investigation concluded that the NCAA violated its own policies,

committee

members announced they were giving Emmert a vote of confidence — a

rare move.

Not much has gone right since then, either. There are two court cases pending, each of which could cost the NCAA millions,

and a couple of weeks ago, the conference commissioner started lobbying publicly for the governance changes.

Last week, word leaked the NCAA was now investigating Heisman Trophy-winner Johnny Manziel for allegedly receiving money for

autographs — something the NCAA declines to confirm. If proven, it would be a violation of NCAA rules and could jeopardize

Manziel's remaining college eligibility at Texas A&M.

On Wednesday, the NCAA was stung with

another embarrassing fiasco when USA Today reported that jerseys and

other memorabilia

items could be purchased on the NCAA's own web site if buyers used

specific names, such as Manziel, in the search tool. Emmert

said Thursday that the NCAA would be out of that business as soon

as possible.

So with all of that looming over headquarters, it was no wonder Simon was asked whether Emmert's job was still safe.

"Mark is an integral part of our process to move forward to strengthen the NCAA and college sports," Simon said, referring

to changes in the governance structure.

How the process plays out is still up for debate.

Some believe the big-budget schools, which

were prevented from offering athletes an additional $2,000 beyond what

their scholarship

covers by an override petition from schools with less money, will

try to start a super-division. The problem with that, of

course, is figuring out how to integrate all the other current

Division I schools into the NCAA's most successful and profitable

event — the men's basketball tournament.

One thing that everyone does seem to agree, though, is that this debate must be more inclusive.

"There have got to be more people at the

table early in the discussions, both the campus voice of faculty

athletic reps and

the senior athletic administrators because those are two groups

that need to be represented," Nebraska law professor and former

infractions committee chairwoman Jo Potuto said. "I think whatever

is coming has got to have a substantial voice from the

athletic directors and the faculty reps, and we have to have a way

to articulate that policy."

But the overarching goal remains getting it right.

"We have many different segments that are

frustrated with the current environment," Emmert told The Associated

Press last

week. "It needs to be done with some speed, but you've got to have

some voices in it. You've got to find ways to reach out,

get a lot of opinions and get people together."

In other business, the board formally

approved the move of three schools to the Football Bowl Subdivision —

Massachusetts,

South Alabama and Texas State. UMass and South Alabama still must

show that they can meet the attendance requirement by showing

they average 15,000 in actual attendance on a rolling two-year

basis. If the requirement is not met, they will receive a notice

of noncompliance and enter a 10-year probationary period.

The board also approved applications for the men's National Collegiate Hockey Conference and the Golden Coast Conference in

women's water polo. Those moves immediately take effect.

Conference USA Commissioner Britton Banowsky was reappointed to chair the Division I infractions committee. Notre Dame senior

deputy athletic director Melissa Conboy will be the vice chair.

NCAA getting out of jersey-selling business

The NCAA is getting out of the memorabilia business.

NCAA President Mark Emmert said Thursday it would stop the practice immediately after reports this week that team jerseys

and other items linked to individual schools could be found on its own website by searching for specific player names.

"I think seeing the NCAA sell those kinds of goods is a mistake," Emmert said during a conference call with reporters. "It's

not what the NCAA is about. So we're not going to be doing that any longer."

The NCAA is being sued by former players and

a handful of current college players in federal court over the use of

athlete

images and likenesses. And just this past week, ESPN reported that

the NCAA is investigating Heisman Trophy-winner Johnny

Manziel for allegedly being paid to sign memorabilia, which if

true could jeopardize eligibility as a violation of NCAA amateurism

rules.

Emmert said the commercial site won't be completely removed because there is still a market for generic NCAA apparel. He said

the NCAA had hired another company to run the site, ShopNCAASports.com.

Mark Lewis, the NCAA's executive vice president for championships and alliances, also released a statement, saying university

merchandise would not be offered, either.

"In the coming days, the store's website will be shut down temporarily and reopen in a few weeks as a marketplace for NCAA

championship merchandise only," Lewis said. "After becoming aware of issues with the site, we determined the core function

of the NCAA.com fan shop should not be to offer merchandise licensed by our member schools."

The move overshadowed a news conference that

was intended to update reporters about possible changes to the NCAA's

governance

structure. Members of the board of directors and executive had a

preliminary discussion on potential changes, though no vote

is expected until next August.

Instead, the hot topics became Manziel, NCAA rules and the website fiasco.

Board chairman Nathan Hatch was asked whether some of the NCAA rules regarding payments to college athletes should be modified.

"I stand by the NCAA's commitment to amateurism, and I believe the way we've done that is the correct way," the Wake Forest

president said. "So I believe the rules we have, we agree with."

The NCAA's new enforcement chief, Jonathan Duncan, later told The Associated Press he does not anticipate modifications to

those rules, either.

"Based on my experience before coming to the

national office, I know that lots of member groups, cabinets and

committees have

looked over the years and that lots of changes have been proposed

and have not been approved," he said. "It's up to the membership

and if they change the rules, the enforcement staff will follow

their lead."

And, of course, back to more memorabilia questions.

"We're exiting it as soon as we feasibly can," Emmert said. "Again, I think it was inappropriate for us to be in that business,

and we won't be in the future."