Beam: We may never know what, when

By By Jim Beam / American Press

What did the president know, and when did he know it?

Ask that question on Google, and you

will get a wide variety of sources. The question, unfortunately, has

become a trademark

of the Obama administration because of its poor handling of a

variety of issues. Some call them scandals, but the president’s

defenders say that’s too strong a word.

The Washington Post back in May called

the IRS targeting of conservative groups a “mess” that didn’t implicate

the White House,

“or even senior IRS leadership.” The newspaper called the killing

of the American ambassador to Libya and three other Americans

at Benghazi “a bureaucratic knife fight between the State

Department and the CIA.” And it said “there’s no evidence that the

DOJ (Department of Justice) did anything illegal” when it seized

Associated Press phone records.

Two of the more recent administration nightmares are the disastrous rollout of Obama’s health care law and the National Security

Agency’s bugging of leaders of America’s allies, particularly those in Germany, France and Spain.

Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of the

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, is the scapegoat for the

dysfunctional Obamacare

website.

“You deserve better,” she told a House committee Wednesday. “I apologize. I’m accountable to you for fixing these problems.

Hold me accountable for the debacle. I’m responsible.”

OK, we will do that, but what did the president know about the problems and when did he know about them? Jay Carney, the White

House spokesman who covers for his boss, said Obama knew there would be glitches but didn’t expect anything monumental.

That is puzzling because the website crashed during a test run when there were just a few hundred users on it. And why did

they go ahead and start trying to enroll people on Oct. 1?

Sebelius said, “There are people in this country who have waited for decades for affordable health coverage for themselves

and their families.”

Yes, there are, and they are still waiting.

Republicans continue to criticize Obamacare, and the Democrats keep telling Americans everything is going to be hunky-dory

once the kinks are ironed out.

The latest wrinkle has to do with people losing health care insurance policies that they were told they could keep. And they

got that promise from none other than the president himself.

“If you like your health care plan, you’ll be able to keep your health care plan,” Obama told the American Medical Association.

“No one will take it away, no matter what.”

Well, policies are being canceled and Carney has come up with another convenient excuse.

“The good news,” he said, “is that for

every one of these individuals who might have a plan that is almost by

definition providing

less than minimal benefits ... you are now being offered a variety

of options, including options by the very insurer that

covers you already, for new coverage.”

One of those choices, which isn’t optional for many, provides for maternity care — even for women who passed child-bearing

age many years ago. That is a tough one to justify.

The Los AngelesTimes quoted a self-employed attorney who is pregnant.

“It doesn’t seem right to make the middle class pay so much more in order to give health insurance to everybody else,” she

said. “This increase is simply not affordable.”

Another woman who complained about a 50 percent rate increase said, “I was all for Obamacare until I found out I was paying

for it.”

Maybe some of those so-called

inadequate policies were exactly what the insured individual liked and

wanted. Why has the government

suddenly become the decision-maker on what kind of insurance

coverage we all need?

The bugging of the phones of world leaders has even outsiders asking tough questions.

Julian Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University, told CNN no one should expect the president

to know everything the NSA is doing.

“But when you’re talking about the surveillance of world leaders and an issue that’s been controversial for a while now, you

would expect that there’s some knowledge either by the president or people surrounding him...,” Zelizer said. “I do think

there’s surprise that this was off the radar in the inner circle of the White House.”

Former officials in the Obama and George W. Bush administrations told The Washington Post it is hard to believe Obama was

never told — and never asked — about the bugging of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s phone.

“... Before every phone call and

meeting with her, intelligence officials brief the president on what the

German leader is

thinking about Iran, economic policy and other issues of interest

to the United States,” those officials told the newspaper.

William A. Galston of the Brookings Institution and a former domestic policy adviser to President Bill Clinton, told The Post

Obama doesn’t appear to be interested in the way government works. He said “the president gives every appearance of being

blindsided by the flow of events.”

“Then people start wondering if he’s in charge, if he’s a strong leader,” Galston said.

Yes, that is exactly what concerns them about recent events. But judging from the response from the administration so far,

it appears Americans will never get a straight answer about what the president knew about almost anything and when he knew

it.

    • • •

Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than five decades. Contact him at 494-4025 or jbeam@americanpress.com